Bell ringer: start here (while attendance happens)
Prediction check · 5 min

Tōhoku 2011 was a magnitude 9.1 quake offshore of Japan. San Andreas quakes happen on land, along a strike-slip fault.
Task: Predict: which one produces a tsunami, and what does the answer depend on?

Answer in your Field Notebook, dated.

Today we are learning

I can identify the dominant hazards of subduction and transform boundary types, and explain why those hazards differ.

I can: tick as you go (for you, not for marks)
full course map →
AI Partners available for today's work
Remember: every AI use gets documented. → AI Documentation Template

What today is about

Connecting today to the unit's anchor question: How do you build for a planet that occasionally tries to destroy what you've built?

Last class you met the four boundary types. Today we go deeper on the two that account for most coastal-city hazards on Earth: subduction zones (Tōhoku, Cascadia, Sumatra) and transform faults (Anatolian, San Andreas). The same physics produces the same hazards everywhere a boundary type exists. By the end of class you'll be able to look at any city on a coast and predict, with reasonable confidence, what its dominant hazards are.

You'll also get your first look at the Tectonic City Builder simulator, the tool you'll use across Blocks 4–12 to design and defend a city plan under real tectonic constraints.

Before you start the work

Start with the Interact: the class works through it together on Mentimeter. The Watch and the Read cover the same ground if you want it again.

Watch (6 min)
"Why subduction zones are tsunami factories"
Read (12 min)
USGS subduction primer + transform-fault explainer
Interact (10 min)
Live cross-sections + Tectonic City Builder demo (teacher-led)

Everyone does this

Vocabulary support
The U3 pre-teach: key terms with definitions and sentence stems. Subduction, megathrust, and strike-slip are all in there.

Today's work: choose one path

All four options build toward the same Learning Intention. Different modalities so you can find the one that works for how you learn.

Learning Intention: I can identify the dominant hazards of subduction and transform boundary types, and explain why those hazards differ.
A
Annotate the cross-sections
Mark up the printed diagrams with the hazards each boundary type produces and the geologic mechanism for each. Submit photo.
Visual · Solo
B
Compare Tōhoku & Kobe
Read the two case-study cards in the Case Study Library. Make a comparison table of hazards. Why are they different?
Text · Solo or pair
C
Predict the sim
Watch the Tōhoku scenario demo. Before Ms. Jayanthi/Mr. Ignash hits "Run Simulation," write down what you think will happen. Compare prediction vs. result in your journal.
Interactive · Whole class
D
Partner discussion
With a partner: which boundary type would you rather live near, and why? Be specific about hazards. Submit 3-bullet summary.
Dialogue · Pair

Open your Class Notebook and type today's entry header as Heading 2:

A: Nov 18 | U3 B2 | Subduction & Transform Deep Dive + Sim DemoB: Nov 19 | U3 B2 | Subduction & Transform Deep Dive + Sim Demo

What you're submitting today

This is the evidence I'm collecting from today's work. It feeds into your unit grade through the rubric below.

Exit ticket (submit by end of class)

Three sentences naming the dominant hazard of each boundary type (subduction, transform) and the geologic mechanism for each.

Submit via Google Classroom (link posted in August)

Rubric link: Today's exit ticket is scored on K/U. See the full Unit 3 rubric for what each band looks like.

One question before you leave

Three to five minutes. Your answer is saved to your reflection journal, where you can read back everything you have written this year.

No grade. This is the metacognitive close that makes the next block easier.

Today's reflection is in Google Classroom, under Reflection Journal.

Link posted in August

Sign in with your school account. Your teacher can see what you write here.