Bell ringer: start here (while attendance happens)
Phenomenon hook · 5 min

Two billboards in Chennai: one says 'Plant a tree, save the planet.' The other says 'New AC subsidies for low-income households during heat waves.'
Task: Which billboard is about mitigation, which about adaptation? Are they competing or complementary?

Answer in your Field Notebook, dated.

Today we are learning

I can define and distinguish mitigation and adaptation with one Chennai example each, identify which lever applies to my challenge, and draft 3-5 specific, actionable, evidence-anchored Recommendations.

I can: tick as you go (for you, not for marks)
full course map →
AI Partners available for today's work
Remember: every AI use gets documented. → AI Documentation Template

What today is about

The defining climate-policy distinction. Today: draft your Brief's Recommendations.

Mitigation = reduce the cause (cut emissions). Adaptation = reduce the impact (build resilience to changes already locked in). Both matter, but Chennai (as a city government, not a national one) has far more adaptation levers than mitigation levers. National policy decides on power plants and fuel taxes. The Greater Chennai Corporation decides on drainage, building codes, cooling shelters, mangrove restoration. Data centers belong on this list too: Chennai is a growing data-center hub, and their cooling draws on the same stressed water system the rest of the city shares; the demand side of Block 4's story becomes an adaptation question here.

The bell ringer makes the distinction visible: two Chennai billboards, side-by-side. One says "Plant a tree, save the planet." The other says "New AC subsidies for low-income households during heat waves." One is mitigation; one is adaptation. Both could be in the same year's budget. Today you internalize the distinction, then apply it to YOUR challenge by drafting the Brief's Recommendations section: 3-5 specific, evidence-anchored, actionable items.

Before you start the work

Start with the Interact: it runs with the whole class before you draft. The Watch is projected first, and the Read is your reference for the choice board.

Placeholder
Watch (~6 min)
TBD: adaptation case studies from 3 cities. Rotterdam (water management). Phoenix (urban heat). Lagos (coastal protection). What worked, what didn't, what's contested. Each ~2 min.
Placeholder
Read (~10 min)
TBD: adaptation-vs-mitigation glossary + GCC's stated adaptation priorities. The official Chennai list: what they've already named, what's in the planning pipeline, what they've explicitly ruled out (or under-funded).
Live in class
Interact (~15 min)
Whole-class billboard sort. 8 example interventions projected one at a time (drawn from challenges students didn't pick). For each: mitigation, adaptation, or both? 30 seconds vote + 60 seconds discuss.

Today's work: choose one path

All four paths end with a first draft of the Recommendations section (3-5 items, specific + evidence-anchored + actionable). No "raise awareness" recommendations.

Learning Intention: I can define and distinguish mitigation and adaptation with one Chennai example each, identify which lever applies to my challenge, and draft 3-5 specific, actionable, evidence-anchored Recommendations.
A
Draft Recommendations (default)
3-5 recommendations for the GCC audience. Each must be: specific (not "raise awareness"), actionable (something GCC can do with their authority), evidence-anchored (cite YOUR sources). Mark each as adaptation, mitigation, or both.
Solo · Default
B
Recommendations + cost/equity annotation (stretch)
Same as Path A, plus for each recommendation: rough cost estimate (high/medium/low), who benefits, who bears the burden. Equity-aware recommendations score higher on T/T 7-8; the rubric specifically calls out "address cost, feasibility, and equity."
Solo · Stretch
C
Policy Aide on weak recommendations (choice)
Draft Recommendations first, then paste them into the Policy Aide. It will push back on any "raise awareness" or "study the problem" recommendations. Rewrite based on its feedback. Document the exchange.
Solo · Choice
D
Adaptation-vs-mitigation peer-help (practice)
If the distinction is still fuzzy after the bell ringer + Watch, come to the peer-help table. Use the GCC priorities Read handout. Pair with a student who's solid. Ms. Jayanthi/Mr. Ignash floats.
Pairs · Practice
FourThought: your challenge, four ways (assigned today, bring to Block 10)

One page, four quadrants, on YOUR adaptation challenge: DESCRIBE it (facts and numbers only) · REACT to it (your honest response; this quadrant is allowed in science) · ANALYZE it (mechanisms, trade-offs, who benefits from the status quo) · SOLVE it (directions, actors, costs, and your strongest candidate). Handwritten or typed; template in Classroom. Block 10's drafting starts FROM this page, so arriving without it means starting cold. The quadrants map almost directly onto the Brief's sections: Describe feeds your situation section, Analyze feeds the science, Solve feeds the recommendations, and React, disciplined by the other three, is what keeps your brief from sounding like a machine wrote it.

Submit via Google Classroom (link posted in August)

Open your Class Notebook and type today's entry header as Heading 2:

A: Feb 11 | U4 B9 | Adaptation vs MitigationB: Feb 12 | U4 B9 | Adaptation vs Mitigation

What you're submitting today

Component 2 (T/T) of the Climate Brief locks today: Recommendations. "Raise awareness" caps this component at 3-4.

Component 2: Recommendations section

3-5 items. Each item: specific action + evidence anchor + label as adaptation / mitigation / both. Format: bulleted list. Example of a strong recommendation: "Install monitoring stations at 12 high-vulnerability coastal points along the Cooum estuary; cost ~₹40 lakh; data goes to GCC adaptation desk monthly." Example of a weak one: "Raise awareness about climate change." Don't submit the second kind. This is a T/T component and it locks today: the band becomes part of your overall T/T mark.

Submit via Google Classroom (link posted in August)

Rubric link: Component 2 is the T/T-primary core of the Brief and the second lock in the rolling-summative sequence. The specificity cap is explicit: vague or unsupported recommendations hold this component's band at 3-4, and that band carries into your overall T/T mark with no end-of-unit re-mark. See the rubric.

One question before you leave

Three to five minutes. Your answer is saved to your reflection journal, where you can read back everything you have written this year.

Today's reflection is in Google Classroom, under Reflection Journal.

Link posted in August

Sign in with your school account. Your teacher can see what you write here.